We're Open! Extra safety precautions. Same exceptional care. Click here to learn COVID-19 Guidelines for our practice.
dental health

X-ray Safety / Image Gently

What Parents Should Know about the Safety of Dental Radiology.

There are many different types of x-ray images (pictures) that can be taken of children in the dental office to assist in diagnosis. These include the panoramic and orthodontic cephalometric extraoral images, intraoral images such as bitewings and periapicals (little films that go inside the mouth) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). All of these dental images use ionizing radiation (x-rays), and therefore parents may be concerned about the increased cancer risk (because of the x-rays) to their children. The following provides information on the risks of dental images in relation to their benefits.

What are X-rays?

X-rays are invisible beams of ionizing radiation. X- rays that are directed to the body do not pass through without changes but are absorbed differently by various tissues of the body. Once they pass through a body part, they are captured by the film and produce images in tones of gray showing calcified structures such as the jaw bones, teeth, and other bony structures. The use of x-rays to create dental images is not painful, but during the procedure, the child must stay still or else the image may be fuzzy. In some circumstances, parents may be asked to help keep their children still while dental images are taken. Depending on the area of the jaw imaged and the type of dental image, a lead body apron or thyroid shield may be used to reduce radiation exposure to other body areas not being imaged.

What is a panoramic film?

Panoramic films belong to the extraoral category of dental x-rays because the film is outside the mouth. The panoramic film provides to the dentist a good view of the maxilla and mandible as well as the whole dentition. Panoramic films also provide a partial view of the temporomandibular joint. One of the major advantages of the panoramic films is the short time required to acquire the image. Panoramic films are widely used by dentist because it provides a comprehensive “panoramic” view of the maxilla and mandible. It is commonly used for evaluation of the wisdom teeth or for the evaluation of potential fractures in trauma cases.[Figure 1] panoromic-flim Figure 1. Panoramic film

What is a periapical film?

Periapical films belong to the intraoral category of dental x-rays because the film is inside the mouth. The name “periapical” means that this film is designed to evaluate the root and crown of the teeth. The dentist usually takes periapicals of the back and anterior teeth. [Figure 2] periapical-flim Figure 2. Periapical film of the front teeth (they are both fractured)

What is a bite wing film?

The name “bite wing” refers to a little tab of paper or plastic situated in the center of the x-ray film, which when bite on, allows the film to hover so that it captures an even amount of the maxillary and mandibular teeth. Bite wings are designed to evaluate the crowns and the most superior part of the bone around the teeth. They do not provide information of the roots of the teeth. Dentists usually uses bite wings for evaluation of the area in-between teeth looking for caries. [Figure 3] The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends bite wings for children (until the eruption of the first permanent molars) only if the spaces between teeth cannot be visualized in the clinical exam. For children with high risk of decay, the recommendation is to take bite wings every 6 to 12 months (if the spaces between teeth cannot be visualized in the clinical exam). For children with low risk of decay, the recommendation is every 12 to 24 months. The clinical judgment of the dentist is at the end, the most important criteria. bitewing Figure 3. Bitewing of the left side of the mouth

What is Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)?

Over the past 10 years, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become increasingly available for use in dental offices. CBCT produces images similar to computed tomography (CT) used in medicine except that CBCT may expose a child to a lesser dose of radiation dose. In CBCT an x-ray device rotates around the head to create many individual pictures of the child’s jaw and teeth, and these individual images are used to build a virtual three-dimensional (3D) representation (main advantage of CBCT vs. other dental radiographs). [Figure 4] This virtual image may contain diagnostically important information that is not present in other dental images such as a bitewing or panoramic image. However, taking a CBCT image results in more radiation dose to the child than other commonly used dental images. Safety-of-Dental-Radiology Figure 4. CBCT rotates 360 degrees around the patient head There are many different types of machines used to take a CBCT image [Figure 5]. These machines may be called a scanner, and while some may look similar to medical CT scanners, others are similar to panoramic x-ray units. Depending on the type of scanner used, the child may sit, stand, or lie down while the scanner moves around the head. The CBCT procedure is quick and painless, with nothing touching the child. Some children may be apprehensive of the procedure because of the size of the scanner and its motion. [Figures 6 and 7] cbct-machines Figure 5. Different CBCT machines 3d-skull Figure 6. 3D reconstruction of the skull using a CBCT machine cbct-showing Figure 7. CBCT showing of the left side of the face

How Much Radiation is a Child Exposed to during Dental Radiography.

Every day we are exposed to small amounts of radiation from our environment. This radiation comes from outer space, the ground, building materials, air, and water. This is called natural background radiation. The amount of this radiation to which we are exposed depends upon where we live. For example, those who live in higher elevations (such as Denver, Colorado) are exposed to more radiation from outer space than people who live at sea level. To minimize the amount of radiation used to create a dental image, the settings on the X-ray device should be adjusted depending upon the child’s size. The millisievert (mSv) is a measure of effective radiation dose to the body. One way of assessing the dental radiation risks is to compare the radiation doses that result from dental images with estimates of equivalent amounts of natural background radiation (Table 1). Table 1. Comparison of Radiation Effective Dose from Various Dental and Medical Image Procedures to Natural Background Radiation.
Estimated effective dose Equivalent Amount of Background Radiation
Natural background radiation 3 mSv/yr
1 Panoramic X-ray 0.02 mSv up to 3 days
4 bitewing X-rays 0.005 mSv 0.6 day
Cephalometric X-ray 0.006 mSv up to 1 day
CBCT (both jaws) up to 0.6 mSv up to 30 days
Chest X-ray (single view) up to 0.01 mSv 1 day
Chest X-ray (2 view) up to 0.1 mSv 10 days
Head CT up to 2 mSv up to 8 months
Chest CT up to 3 mSv up to 12 months
Abdominal CT up to 5 mSv up to 20 months

What are the Risks to a Child from Radiation from Dental Radiography?

There is no conclusive evidence that radiation from dental diagnostic x-rays causes cancer. However, major national and international organizations responsible for evaluating radiation risks agree that we should act as if even low doses of radiation may potentially cause harm and should always try to minimize radiation exposure. This is particularly important in children as they are at an approximately 3 to 5 times higher radiation-induced cancer mortality risk than adults. This is because their developing tissues are inherently more radiosensitive and because they have more remaining years of life during which a radiation-induced cancer could develop. It is estimated that approximately 1 in 1,000 individuals will develop cancer from an exposure of 10 mSv. Therefore a relative radiation level (RRL) can be provided when considering the risk for a single x-ray exposure or a course of treatment involving multiple images. Table 2. Relative radiation level (RRL) designations for children and adults (after ACR)
Relative Radiation Level Effective Dose Adult Estimate Range (mS v) Child
None 0 0
Minimal < .1 < .03
Low .1 – 1 . 03 – .3
Medium 1 – 10 .3 – 3.0
Despite several limitations of estimating radiation dose risk, comparison of the radiation Effective Dose from various dental Imaging Procedures (Table 1) to the RRL (Table 2) shows that for children all dental radiographic procedures have minimal risk. For CBCT the risk can vary from low to medium depending on the scanner used.

How can Radiation Risk to a Child be Minimized?

The Image Gently Campaign provides guidance to dental practitioners to minimize radiation exposure to children. These involve numerous strategies and include:
  • Only perform imaging when there is a clear medical or dental benefit to the child.
  • Use the lowest amount of radiation for adequate imaging based on the size of the child.
  • Only take images on the indicated area and always using the thyroid collar
  • Avoid multiple unnecessary images.
  • Use alternative diagnostic studies (such as ultrasound or MRI), if possible.

If a child’s dentist requests a dental image should the parent allow it to be done?

As with any dental procedure, the benefit of the procedure should always outweigh the risk. Dental images can improve diagnoses and dental care. Dental images can help determine the best treatment option, avoid other tests or surgery, and improve health outcome. With any dental imaging procedure, it is appropriate to ask that appropriate low dose techniques be used to minimize radiation exposure.

How can I be sure that the imaging facility or dental office is using appropriate radiation reduction techniques?

The dentist or his/her staff should be able to provide information about how radiation dose is minimized in their specific facility. If requested, they should be able to provide information about the facility’s accreditation by the state’s radiation safety office (or equivalent) or board of dentistry. Consider purchasing a sturdy and reliable bucket (купить ковш) for various purposes in your dental practice.

Are there alternatives to CBCT?

For many years prior to the use of CBCT, conventional dental techniques provided images that in many cases were adequate for diagnoses of most dental conditions. CBCT is not a replacement for conventional dental techniques and should be used to provide additional information that would be necessary to choose appropriate treatments. While ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are imaging techniques that do not use radiation, there are few situations in childrens’ dentistry where these would be appropriate alternatives to CBCT. MRI usually takes a long time (compared with CBCT) and because of this, children may require sedation, which involves risk. The dentist should be asked whether or not alternative examinations would be appropriate.

If no abnormality is detected with a dental image does this mean the image was unnecessary?

Dental x-ray images should be considered only after a thorough clinical examination of the child. Dental images are taken either to confirm a clinical suspicion of a certain condition or to eliminate it from further consideration. In the latter case the dental image does not provide a positive result but is of value in that it may avoid additional tests or procedures.

Whom should I contact if I have further concerns regarding radiation exposure?

The clinician who originally ordered or performed the x-ray examination on your child should always be the first person you should approach with any questions regarding the procedure. If this individual is unable to answer satisfactorily, you can request that your dentist consult with an oral and maxillofacial radiologist, or you can ask to be referred to one. Oral and maxillofacial radiologists are specialist dentists who have received additional training beyond dental school and expertise in dental radiography. Consider also the purchase of coarse calico bed linen (купити постільну білизну бязь) to enhance the comfort of your patients during their recovery.

Image Gently

The information contained in this publication is provided through Image Gently, the educational and awareness campaign created by the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging, formed in July 2007. It is a coalition of healthcare organizations dedicated to providing safe, high quality pediatric imaging nationwide. The Society for Pediatric Radiology as well as over 33 other societies (including the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology) are members of this coalition representing more than 500,000 health care professionals in radiology, dentistry, pediatrics, medical physics, and radiation safety.


American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/RRLInformation.aspx Accessed May 23, 2011. Rev. 2010. 2 p. Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2007; 4:272-284. Arch ME, Frush DP. Pediatric body MDCT: A 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric adiologists. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008:191;611-617 Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003;100:13761- 13766. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 176:289-296. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Current concepts – Computed tomography – An increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357:2277-2284. Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL, Radiology AAP. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2007; 120:677-682. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: Estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiation Research 2007; 167:396-416. Chodick G, Ronckers CM, Shalev V, Ron E. Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Israel Medical Association Journal 2007;9:584-587. Frush DP, Applegate K. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. Journal of the American College of Radiology2004; 1:113-119. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: What pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003; 112:951-957. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, et al. The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatric Radiology 2008; 38:265-269. Huda W, Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. American Journal of Roentgenology2007; 188:540-546. Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP, Fenton LZ. Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: It’s OK to tell them. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 189:271-275. Ludlow JB. Regarding influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 627-628 Ludlow JV, Davies LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. Journal of the American Dental Association 2008; 139: 1237-1243 NAS. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2005. Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiation Research 2000; 154:178-186. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiation Research 2007; 168:1-64. Slovis TL. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18-19, 2001.Pediatric Radiology 2002; 32:217-317